Sherlock Holmes GoS
Dec. 16th, 2011 08:35 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Spoilers! There are spoilers under the cut. I am going to babble like a babbling thing about this movie, so you have been warned. Read at your own risk, because I lay it all out there.
First off, OMG. I freely admit, I was worried a bit about this. I wondered if they would fall into the same trap as so many sequels, where they end up killing the thing that made the first movie amazing. Too many times they go too far overboard and rather than being fun, a movie becomes silly. Or action becomes all the movie is about, or the characters are left behind to become caricatures. But this.... Oh, I should have trusted.
When the killed Irene, I was happy. Thrilled. I didn't like her in the first one, and I thought she served no purpose in this, other than a catalyst. I liked Irene in the books. She was a powerful, strong woman who was clever and who Holmes underestimated because of her gender. I didn't like vixen Irene who was more whore than lady. I don't think a woman has to be a bitch or a slut to be powerful. A woman can be gentle, can be equal with a man and polite. She doesn't have to try to and bust his balls every chance she has, and that's what I hated about Irene. She was so far from what the character originally was the only thing she shared was the name. So I'm glad they killed her.
The stag night was funny. I liked how Holmes had become so obsessed with Moriarty that he totally forgot. Probably on purpose, actually. It broke my heart, watching the movie, to see how much Holmes loved his Watson, and how it was breaking him to watch him leave. Whether you see slash or just epic friendship, Watson was Holmes' rock. He kept him grounded and allowed him to flourish, and without him Holmes floundered. They portrayed that beautifully. The scene right before the wedding, when Holmes took Watson's hand and they limped in together.... That was just... Right there. That's their friendship right there.
Also, without his Holmes, Watson stagnated. You could see it in the way he let loose at his stag party and with the gypsies. He may think he wants marriage and kids and a steady job, but I can guarantee that within a year he would be bored silly and longing for adventure.
Speaking of the gypsies, I liked Sim. I loved her, in fact. She was a great character who wasn't trying to compete with the main characters, who was powerful in her own way. She didn't have to flaunt herself to try and prove herself, she simply was that amazing. She had her own concerns, and her own connections. She wasn't trying to play Holmes or Watson, and she added to the story rather than just sitting there as pretty window dressing. So, finally! A woman who had courage and brains and her own story.
Mary. I hate movie Mary. She was a simpering cow who I was all too happy to see pushed off the train. Yay, Holmes! I absolutely loved when she was staying with Mycroft how he was going about naked to throw her off. In my head, Mycroft knows how Holmes feels about Watson, and wasn't too happy with her. So for his baby brother, he wandered around naked because he knew it would throw her off. That, and he's Mycroft!
There was so much action, and fighting, and torture, and the boys being boys. But the ending. Oh, my. The end. When Watson comes through that door and, just for a moment, meets Holmes' eye, and then Holmes goes over the falls... My heart broke. Holmes looked so utterly peaceful, accepting death, embracing it even, knowing his Watson was safe. The contract between him and Moriarty was amazing and powerful, and all in the space of a few heartbeats.
Amazing. This movie was wonderful. Funny and heartbreaking and powerful. I know some people are put off by the lack of women, or the fact that there's too much action. But Sherlock Holmes was never about the women. It was about these two amazing men, and their friendship, and the mysteries. If you want a story about women, then I hate to say it, but you're looking at the wrong fandom. There were powerful women, but they were never the center of the stories, and they shouldn't be.
There was action, too, but the original stories were action adventures! It was chasing criminals and fighting bad guys and taking down evil. And this is a Hollywood movie. There's going to be explosions and fight scenes, which is a sad fact.
I only wish they had showed Holmes' brilliance more, showed his thought processes more and focused a bit less on his fighting abilities.
So, that's that. Not a very good review, I know. Mostly just me babbling about what I loved and didn't love about it. Let me know your thoughts?
First off, OMG. I freely admit, I was worried a bit about this. I wondered if they would fall into the same trap as so many sequels, where they end up killing the thing that made the first movie amazing. Too many times they go too far overboard and rather than being fun, a movie becomes silly. Or action becomes all the movie is about, or the characters are left behind to become caricatures. But this.... Oh, I should have trusted.
When the killed Irene, I was happy. Thrilled. I didn't like her in the first one, and I thought she served no purpose in this, other than a catalyst. I liked Irene in the books. She was a powerful, strong woman who was clever and who Holmes underestimated because of her gender. I didn't like vixen Irene who was more whore than lady. I don't think a woman has to be a bitch or a slut to be powerful. A woman can be gentle, can be equal with a man and polite. She doesn't have to try to and bust his balls every chance she has, and that's what I hated about Irene. She was so far from what the character originally was the only thing she shared was the name. So I'm glad they killed her.
The stag night was funny. I liked how Holmes had become so obsessed with Moriarty that he totally forgot. Probably on purpose, actually. It broke my heart, watching the movie, to see how much Holmes loved his Watson, and how it was breaking him to watch him leave. Whether you see slash or just epic friendship, Watson was Holmes' rock. He kept him grounded and allowed him to flourish, and without him Holmes floundered. They portrayed that beautifully. The scene right before the wedding, when Holmes took Watson's hand and they limped in together.... That was just... Right there. That's their friendship right there.
Also, without his Holmes, Watson stagnated. You could see it in the way he let loose at his stag party and with the gypsies. He may think he wants marriage and kids and a steady job, but I can guarantee that within a year he would be bored silly and longing for adventure.
Speaking of the gypsies, I liked Sim. I loved her, in fact. She was a great character who wasn't trying to compete with the main characters, who was powerful in her own way. She didn't have to flaunt herself to try and prove herself, she simply was that amazing. She had her own concerns, and her own connections. She wasn't trying to play Holmes or Watson, and she added to the story rather than just sitting there as pretty window dressing. So, finally! A woman who had courage and brains and her own story.
Mary. I hate movie Mary. She was a simpering cow who I was all too happy to see pushed off the train. Yay, Holmes! I absolutely loved when she was staying with Mycroft how he was going about naked to throw her off. In my head, Mycroft knows how Holmes feels about Watson, and wasn't too happy with her. So for his baby brother, he wandered around naked because he knew it would throw her off. That, and he's Mycroft!
There was so much action, and fighting, and torture, and the boys being boys. But the ending. Oh, my. The end. When Watson comes through that door and, just for a moment, meets Holmes' eye, and then Holmes goes over the falls... My heart broke. Holmes looked so utterly peaceful, accepting death, embracing it even, knowing his Watson was safe. The contract between him and Moriarty was amazing and powerful, and all in the space of a few heartbeats.
Amazing. This movie was wonderful. Funny and heartbreaking and powerful. I know some people are put off by the lack of women, or the fact that there's too much action. But Sherlock Holmes was never about the women. It was about these two amazing men, and their friendship, and the mysteries. If you want a story about women, then I hate to say it, but you're looking at the wrong fandom. There were powerful women, but they were never the center of the stories, and they shouldn't be.
There was action, too, but the original stories were action adventures! It was chasing criminals and fighting bad guys and taking down evil. And this is a Hollywood movie. There's going to be explosions and fight scenes, which is a sad fact.
I only wish they had showed Holmes' brilliance more, showed his thought processes more and focused a bit less on his fighting abilities.
So, that's that. Not a very good review, I know. Mostly just me babbling about what I loved and didn't love about it. Let me know your thoughts?
no subject
Date: 2011-12-17 05:20 am (UTC)I have no idea where Kelly Rielly got the memo that said "MAKE HER DUMBER, WHINIER AND BLONDER" because, damn, I wish I had a Little Hansel to point at the screen every time she showed up like a Mel Brook squeaky girl. And NO to her and the Red Book. Minus 1,000,000. You "liked him in your own way"? Whatever, Mary. PLS BE GETTIN THE TUBERCULOSIS AND DYIN' NAO, THANX BYE.
By contrast, Sim was cool, smart, tough and had her own amazing life. She also cooks a mean hedgehog.
Holmes looked so utterly peaceful, accepting death, embracing it even, knowing his Watson was safe.
This destroyed me. Unrequited, yet unconditional, love is very painful to watch. Just a glimpse of his face kept behind closed eyes to be able to die happy? Um, Holmes, you deserve better than that, but I know, you don't want better -- you want him, always and forever. And he wants ... ugh. Ouch.
I'm all teary again now. *sniffle* Maybe it's hormones, but this movie struck me as scary and very, very sad. (Although Moran after them in the forest -- best thing since some prime David Lynch. What beautiful work.)
no subject
Date: 2011-12-17 05:29 am (UTC)You know, maybe this makes me kind of pathetic, but I can totally understand Holmes and his love for Watson. He's a very private person, he doesn't let people in, and when he does - he loves them unconditionally, totally and completely. There's no desire in him to want anyone else. He's found the one, and that's all he needs. The fact that Watson doesn't, or can't, return his love, hurts. But it's the kind of hurt where you know he would rather have some of Watson than lose him completely.
God, can't they just kill Mary off now so the boys can get back together? I mean, seriously. That bitch, telling Watson she liked Holmes in her own way. What way was that, the one where you, a lowly governess, looks down her nose at him? Bah!
I'm just going to keep picturing Holmes throwing her from the train. I wanted to clap!
no subject
Date: 2011-12-17 11:07 am (UTC)I did, Loudly twice and got some of the audience to do it as well.
Your understanding as stated just above--of Holmes and his love for Watson. YES. THIS. You put it perfectly. That private "Sherly No Mates" person loves with all his heart and soul--and he really can't spread that superficially over a bunch of medical colleagues, rugby mates and whatever other friends Watson was braggiing about having. It is ever the quality of the friends you have, not the quantity--and Holmes dared to put all the eggs in one proverbial basket...and accepts the consequences of that. I could kick Watson's ass for all those comments...but that is another rant. And I'm not sure of Holmes not having "Loved too well but not wisely" given Watson's juvenile behavior in this film.
Glad to know I'm not the only one who hates Movie Mary even MORE now. I didn't think that was possible. Hell, in retrospect I LOVE Irene---between the two I'd rather have had Irene live than Mary...
no subject
Date: 2011-12-17 12:09 pm (UTC)And in retrospect(after a fitful night of sleep) I don't think Watson was bragging or being mean, I think he's desperately -- and vehemently -- trying to convince himself that he likes "normality" (or his version of it) and is pretty much lying like a rug.
"I HAVE FRIENDS. AND A WIFE. AND WILL HAVE KIDS. AND I WILL LOVE IT NO MATTER WHAT YOU BELIEVE. YES!"
"Okay, don't dance with the gypsys then, dear Watson."
"OMG, I LOVE DANCING! AND GAMBLING! AND DRINKING! AND SHOOTING BIG GUNS! \o/"
"Sigh."
no subject
Date: 2011-12-17 02:26 pm (UTC)Still... I think the scene before the wedding made up for it, as when it all came down to it, they were still in things together. Oh, boys!
no subject
Date: 2011-12-17 11:35 am (UTC)I've a hard time hating on either Irene or Mary, to be honest, because I think both Rachel MacAdams and Kelly Reilly are fantastic actresses; but I hated the way they treated Irene in the first movie, and the fact that they just off and kill her in this one doesn't make me sympathise much with the scriptwriters. She's an interesting character in her own way, but she's simply not Irene Adler, and that they should eventually just reduce the greatest female character in the entire Holmes books to an annoying extra who gets killed off in grand indifference is frankly frustrating.
As for Mary, I liked her well enough in the first movie, so I'll have to see what they make of her in this one. None of what I've heard so far is very positive :/
Terribly excited for Reichenbach, though. All the Sherlock Holmes-related fandoms are going to be in tears this year.
no subject
Date: 2011-12-17 11:54 am (UTC)For all that Irene is only in the movie for five minutes--she manages to effect it going forward in a way her entire performance in the first film did not.
no subject
Date: 2011-12-17 12:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-12-17 02:29 pm (UTC)I don't think Irene was killed indifferently. Remember, she was only in one story, so her very presence in the first movie was rather superfluous. At this point, having her in the movie served no purpose and was really pushing things. Her death was a catalyst, and it wasn't treated cavalierly.
I think some people have a problem because there was no weeping and pulling of hair. But Holmes isn't like that, never has been and never will be. The impact of her death is played beautifully, and, in my opinion, is all the more powerful for it's subtlety.
no subject
Date: 2011-12-17 05:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-12-17 05:19 pm (UTC)I'll have to see for myself, I guess. I heard very completely diverging opinions about her death, so I can't really make up my mind regarding it yet.
Thanks for the in-depth review, anyhow — I'm very much looking forward to seeing this now.
no subject
Date: 2011-12-17 03:21 pm (UTC)Also HURRAH! I totally hated movie Irene too. :P And I suppose it would be too much to hope they'd killed Mary off as well. ::whistles:: Maybe in the next one. ;)
no subject
Date: 2011-12-17 05:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-12-17 05:58 pm (UTC)It is a really good sequel. I usually don't like them because the leave out all the things that made the fist one so special, but this one really did a good job I think. I'm going to see it again tomorrow, and maybe Monday, lol.
no subject
Date: 2011-12-17 10:17 pm (UTC)However, on to the rest of the movie!
I am a big fan of how both RDJ and JL portrayed these characters in the movie, though. I forget how good an actor RDJ is, really. Some of my favourite moments have been mentioned, Piplover brought up the last scene above the falls and described it absolutely perfectly. But one of my faves is the scene right after the party, when you can just TELL that Watson's head is on the verge of falling off his shoulders. Watson tugging the blanket petulantly. Holmes reaching out his hand and Watson clinging to it as he walks over the ground like a tightrope artist. The business in the train OMG THE TRAIN!!!! (never mind the slightly anachronistic medical procedure. Big D commented, when I mentioned it "you mean it wasn't publicized yet...") The last dance, both of them dressed to the nines, the conversation, then "on to work"...somehow so right.
I must agree, Irene's death worked for me. She had finished her arc and it emphasized just what a rotter Moriarity is.
Spoiler! Spoiler! Well...vague spoiler!
Just wondering about this, if I'm the only one that's somewhat perturbed about the fact the big emotional OMG beat for the start of part 3 has effectively been eliminated? :( Maybe that'll be Mary's death. Just because I don't loath her doesn't mean I don't think her character should follow the same route as it did in the books. It really should be Holmes and Watson to the end.
Must see this again. This is a rouser and no mistake.
no subject
Date: 2011-12-17 11:06 pm (UTC)For me, Mary of the movie doesn't work, no matter how tough she appears for a few minutes. Her actions did absolutely nothing to endear her to me.
My problem with Mary is her whole attitude. Her superior than thou, looking down her nose at Holmes attitude. I'm sorry, but he's her husband's best friend. You don't make your beloved choose. You just don't. And although she may never say the words, her whole attitude is one of "choose me over him."
Watson may not have married a dope, but he did marry a simpering, arrogant woman. Her ability to hold a gun does nothing to raise her in my eyes. Especially when she was whining to Watson the whole time.
Sorry, that was probably more vitriolic than I meant for, but I do despise movie Mary.
As for the end, I think we may still have our OMG moment. After all, Holmes hasn't revealed himself yet! I'm still hoping for a faint and dramatics!
And yes, for Mary to die, lol!